Thursday, May 04, 2006

 

SPEAKING PROTOZOA

Summary of the I II installments SPEAKING PROTOZOA written words MONDOLEONE OPVS © 2006
And it will be never enough to say it and to re-say it, we come from organic drifts provoked by combination on this planet, because therefore it was, without reason neither cause, organic means meat, bones, feces, blood,urinea, hairs and nails. If all goes, we are in the so-called life, that is the physiochemical reactions proceed, but this reactions are getting ruined second after second. In sum, we after been born have a time limit in which these physiochemical reactions will be able or they will not be able to operate, to some wretch they do not spin smooth already in the womb of the mother, to others soon after the exit and then those that remain operating until the concurred maximum. All we know that we must die at the maximum of 110 years, beyond, we still not go.
Naturally, the knowledge of not to be able to live in eternal plays a fundamental role in us, speaking animals, and we will see it; now it must mark-out that we are very little thing, if we had not spoken we would be equally to the meat from slaughter house, instead therefore we are dressed meat & speaking meat, butpettishs and always in need. This planet is made of devoid and violent materials, therefore the cruelty is in the flea as in the whale, it was before that we spoke and after, to have spoken has modify nothing, and if we have begun to speak it was just in order to hold, to attends our fury.
And here it is the point, we have only the word to master such ferocity; if we make one subway train full of dogs males and females, like at peak hour in NYC, what would it happen? Here, we speak and have in the head passed on norms, hand down by words and hold back in the intrasubjective thought with words, and then we remain in the train still, shoulder to shoulder, at least the majority.
This to demonstrate that all that that humanly happens in this planet is not relative, but very relative, partial, arbitrary, and being we animals with word, but not of word, in order to make to become the norms of the living common, absolute and universal norms, we, must complete a huge effort, but one tried application & logical explanation of the word for the word, has not still never happened in some place of the Earth. It is pulled ahead between laws of the states, based on the popular wisdom and transcendental tall tales, based on the psychopathological delirium. Here, the psychopathology is the kernel.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

 

SPEAKING PROTOZOA II installment

written words MONDOLEONE OPVS © 2006
This is a rough translation of the Italian original, if you wish to edit it, diffuse it in other languages, contact us Consequently we speak, and in base as we developed ourselves, and which physical means we have, it was the only and unique thing that we could make. In the animal world without word it can be easily observed the tension, the restlessness, the apprehension, and how never? It is that the same primary materials are "violent & cruel", not to say of the ferocity of the element time, also the so-called nature has a brutality outside the common one, all fury & ferocity here on the planet, stop illusion, please; and here the word in order to try to control, in order to construct that impossible one to construct, in order to establish the pact. Naturally the weakness of the word is to all very famous, but at the same time it is the only thing that we humans have.
In all these centuries of word, little or null are made invigorate it, to equip it of its own force, the word for the word. It always comes taken for guaranteed, like breathing, given to us as pertaining to us: natural, on the contrary not & not, it does not exist nothing more artificial than the word, it must be study and to be reflected on the grammar & rhetorical, the rules to use the language, be reasoned above all on the sound, and sure on the graphic signs, ponder all the combinatory of the word.
This would save the world, those United Notions, that the mondoleonian vision it sees and it previews, are based on the development of the word in itself and for itself. A common effort between rich and poor states, cause all have urgent need to equip themselves with the use of the word, we must make ourselves the maximum human than we can, schooling for all, also for the university and political and intellectual big heads, they are considered great minds, in truth they are hardly "mini-minds", all needy to study the word to improve their vacuous speech arrested to the level of scholars of primary school third grade, when it goes well.
Once happened the invention of the word from the primate in Africa, here we are to make speeches, to give a name to all, two to ourselves minimum (the noble persons have a list of names in order to define themselves). Also in this case: written papers & written papers on the origin of the word, and is not a question to be specialist or not to be specialist in order to understand all those empty written meaningless.
Someone (would have to give a Nobel prize to the memory to this unknown speaker), male or female that had been, has understood that the animal outcry was not enough in order to find an understanding, an agreeing and then s-he has tried to modulate it, emitting more sounds, consequently its pack has found the conventions: if we make this sound, will want to mean this, this other sound, this other and consequently; other packs will not have understood, still acting, 100% , like animals: screaming, giving whacks, bites; then those of the speaking pack will be generate new humans, and the new born will have learned those sounds of pappas & mammas for how much can itself be learned, and they will have been scattered, always more and always with greater facility regarding those not speaking, in how much the word brings the thought: intrasubjective thought, in sum they have been most clever of all, we still are.
And here the symbolic one, well to define it symbolic, is worth to say: the more or less civil life, that one of every day, ours, operating within the national laws from norms and rules transmitted by the language, from the Eskimos passing for the SierraLeonians until the New Zealanders. The language, although is fragile and weak, remains the unique and single thing that we have and we will have. The new born comes dipped in it, hair to toe, naturally is a watery language made of rhetoric, containing nothing but illusion, however still always a weak broth of words, to which the only escape can be with a serious madness one; then or variously crazy speaker or total crazy outside the word, here it is the choice.
We could say that the word, as soon as the life of the infant starts the maternal womb, the word is already there, waiting the poor creature who does not have many alternatives, between the two above, there is a third and last one: the sudden death. Then, the word remains and will remain the single and only thing that we humans have? Yes, period. But always human artifice, invented by the humans to the aim of being used by other humans, and we must remove here all the divine, supreme beings & several tall stories, please be kind. These words must be eliminated from the dictionary, we are since always on this turning ball , all we have been carried out here and it will be continued to carry out here, to arrive until Jupiter or Saturn is useless, thanks for nothing, only pass-life & plaything.
Others have approached the modification from protozoa to human being equipped of intrasubjective thought, that it cost millions & millions of years, to what it happens today in the uterus of the mothers and then until the four years, with the taken of the word and the knowledge of the possession of the intrasubjective thought: it means words in the head without to let out of the mouth. The mondoleonian vision: Löweweltanschauung fixes the intrasubjective thought at four years of age. You, when have begun to think? Being aware to think, we repeat it, to say words in the brain without having to emit them vocally in front of everybody. Here: word and consequently intrasubjective thought is all which the human has. And then the taken one of the Bastille serves to very little without "The taken of the word". Thanks to all SERIAL ESSAY ISSUED IN INSTALLMENTS ON saunablog II installment TO FOLLOW 10x

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?